№ 16. Записка Митрополита Филарета о действиях ревизионных комитетов
Machine translation from the original · Show original
There is no dispute against the note about the rims. If anything, I don’t argue against the note on the actions of the audit committees. But, it seems, what would be the use of writing notebooks about what was found as it should be? Wouldn’t one word about this be enough: right? And what is wrong, let them write about what was observed, what explanations were given, and what the opinion was.
You might be interested in: