Shkëmbiatorët kritikoj Episkopët SHBA për përjashtimin e pravësive të përgjegjshme të përsëri të përcaktuar të kuptimit të përgjithshëm në rastin e përpjesës së 2030-së.përkthyer

Many legal scholars and other experts strongly disagreed with the bishops’ claim that excluding noncitizens from the census means they are not persons. The U.S. bishops’ opposition to proposed rule changes affecting the 2030 census has provoked sharp criticism from U.S. historians and scholars, especially concerning the assertion that excluding noncitizens in the census count denies their personhood.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the proposed rule changes would remove demographic questions about race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation, and would count for congressional apportionment only citizens and lawful permanent residents.

The proposal says “illegal aliens (among others) should not be included in the apportionment count, as they are not true inhabitants, members of the body politic, or persons with a ‘usual residence’ in the United States.”

In an Oct. 20 letter submitted to Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, among other points, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ general counsel argued that excluding noncitizens from the apportionment count “is effectively to deny they are ‘persons.’” They wrote that this “denial of personhood recalls the ‘overtly sinful and gravely unjust’ Three-fifths Compromise.”

The Three-fifths Compromise was the political deal reached at the 1787 U.S. Constitutional Convention that counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation and taxation.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has also been criticized by historians and scholars for comparing the proposed changes to the 18th century slave compromise, which they argue is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.

The U.S. bishops have stated that their opposition is based on the belief that all persons, regardless of citizenship status, should be counted in the census to accurately reflect the population and ensure fair representation.

The U.S. bishops’ stance has been seen as a continuation of their long-standing commitment to social justice and the protection of the rights of all people, including immigrants and non-citizens.

The proposed rule changes have also been criticized for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees all persons equal protection under the law.

The U.S. bishops have called for a fair and inclusive census that accurately reflects the population and ensures fair representation for all.

The U.S. bishops’ opposition to the proposed rule changes has been met with strong criticism from historians and scholars, who argue that the comparison to the 18th century slave compromise is an inappropriate and inaccurate comparison.