Notes about the village of Kravotyni

Contents Geographical position The most ancient news about the village of Kravotyni Clergy of the introduced church of the village of Kravotyni Published article † prof. V.V. Bolotova about the village of Kravotyni (Tver province of Ostashkovsky district), where he was born and raised and where then everyone usually spent summer holidays for almost a year in his mother’s house, was found after his death in the papers left behind by him. It was written no earlier than 1895, since it (p. 528) quotes The Nautica lAlmanac for the year 1898 London [the year is not indicated, but at the end of the preface p. IX stands 1894 November 26]. Wed. also the name in it (p. 528:531) “deceased” Archpriest. V.P. Uspensky, † December 28, 1894 (M. Rubtsov, V.V. Bolotov [Biographical sketch]. Tver 1990, p. 14). Apparently, it was intended for publication somewhere and was carefully rewritten by V.V. Bolotov, but does not have a special title in the manuscript. The end of the manuscript, written on separate sheets of large postal format, is missing (cf. on p. 539, A, 9 the link to the missing continuation of the list of deacons). the village of Kravotyni is unknown with accuracy; but it can be assumed with a high degree of probability that the church of the village of Kravotyni lies under ϕ =+57°16'50« [north latitude] λ =+33° 8'20" Greenwich [east longitude from Greenwich]. The oldest news about the village of Kravotyni Everything that is known about the ancient past of the village of Kravotyni was collected and presented by the late Ostashkov archaeologist, Archpriest Vladimir Petrovich Uspensky, in his brochure: “Chapel of the Mother of God of the Three-Handed Ones of the Krovotyn parish of the Ostashkov district, in connection with the history of the area,” Tver 1891, pp. 3–8. Only very little can be added to the words of this remarkable expert on Ostashkov antiquity. The most ancient news about Kravotyn is found in Novgorod scribal books (“Novgorod Scribe Books, published by the Archaeographic Commission. Volume one: Census Obrochnaya Book of the Derevskaya Pyatina around 1495.” St. Petersburg 1859). – For greater clarity, I restore the context in which Kravotyn was mentioned. Page 612. “Zhabenskaya churchyard. The Grand Duke of the volost of Zhabna, who was the empress. In the churchyard there is the Church of Great St. Nicholas" Page 629. “And all the villages according to the old letter and with a graveyard are 144, and there are half 600 courtyards in them without a courtyard [i.e. e. 549 households], and there are 584 people in them.” “And all the villages in Zhabna, according to the new letter, are two hundred and thirty and four, and the courtyards are seven hundred and fifty and nine, and the people in them are seven hundred and seventy and five people, and there are seven hundred and eighty and one and a half villages = 781 ½, and the dry land is two hundred and sixty and half dry. In the Zhabinsky churchyard of the Grand Duke there is a Zoltso churchyard on Lake Seliger, which was visited by rulers. On Krovotyna Church of the Presentation of the Holy Mother of God: d[or] Onkudinko Levin, dv. Yakushko, dv. Onoimko Ileikin, d. Panteleiko Kostin dv. Matveiko, dv. Levka Fomkin Yakimko Yakushov dv. Opanka Karpikov dv. Ivashko Yakutov [hence in the Zoltsy churchyard there were 8 households and 9 “people”, i.e. 9 householders]; they sow 21 boxes of rust, and mow hay 120 kopecks, 9 obezh.” Page 630. “On Glubokoe in Zaluchye there is a churchyard of the lords; dv. Tamoshka Kuzemkin” [etc.; counted 52 households, 56 people]; “They sow 105 boxes of rust, and they mow 420 kopecks of hay, 51 kopecks. And the villages to the churchyard: Village of the Holy on Holy Lake: dv. Maximko Markov" (etc.; total 4 yards, 5 people); “to sow rye 9 boxes, and to mow hay 50 kopecks, 4 hay.D. Birch: door Sergeiko Terekhov” [etc.; only 4 yards, 5 people]; “they sow 8 boxes of rust; and they mow half a hay - 60 = 55 kopecks, 4 crops. And according to the old letter, all the households in the churchyard are 40 minus one, and there are half a people in them - 70 people with one [= 66 householders], and there are 50 households. And 2 villages arrived, and there are 21 households, and there are 9 households. And according to the new letter, there are 3 villages with a graveyard, and there are 60 households in them, and there are 66 people in them, and there are 50 households [read: 59??], and the plow was 20 without a third of the plow. Page 631. “In Zhabnya, the village of the Grand Duke, who visited the Spaskis of the Futyn monastery in Kostrublya: D. Volkovo.” Page 639. “The volost of the Grand Duke Berezovets 2 Marfinskaya Isakov on Lake Seliger, which was behind the prince behind Ivan.” Page 640. “On Gorodishche there is the Church of the Nativity of the Most Pure Ones, and a large courtyard. On the settlement on church land: door [or] priest Ivonya, door. diyak Oleshko, dv. church watchman Kalinka. And the Savior has 3 abbots in the monastery. Yes on the monastery land: dv. clerk Manka, dv. Borisko, dv. church watchman Yakush. And taxable people in the settlement: two. Ivashko Levonovya” – – – “dv. Senka Fedkov." On Shcheberek 4; dv. Ovdeyko Moseykov, d. Eustratik Lukin; sow rye and polt. 80 [= 75] cartons, and hay is cut at 500 kopecks, thirty obezh and two obzhzh.” From the above extracts it is easy to understand the general plan of the “Census Obrochnaya Book”: first (from p. 612) those villages of the Zhabensky volost “that were rulers” are described, that is, until 1478 they belonged to the Novgorod ruler himself; then (from p. 681) former monastic estates; finally (from p. 639) former landowner estates. The description of the Zhabensky volost is actually completed on page 629: the results of two censuses are summed up, the former (“according to the old letter”) and the new one, which took place around 1495 (“according to the new letter”). And then in a row there is talk about Zolets and Zaluchye. The late V.P. Uspensky writes (p. 4): “Glubokoye began to be listed in the Zhabensky churchyard.” I don't see what this opinion is based on. The text of the “Census Quit Book” (p. 630) is easiest to understand in the sense that Zaluchye constituted a special graveyard (like Zhabna) and, moreover, a “pogost of rulers.” The “book” does not say here: the graveyard of the Grand Duke, who was the ruler; One can, therefore, think that this churchyard on Glubokoe in Zaluchye belonged to the Novgorod archbishop around 1495. During the previous census, Zaluchye on Glubokoye was only one “pogost” without any villages belonging to the “pogost”. By 1495, settlements had already appeared from Zaluchye - the villages of Svyatoe and Bereza. The position of the “Zolets churchyard” is even more peculiar: it is included in the “Zhabinsky churchyard” explicitissime; like the “Zhabenskaya churchyard”, it “was a ruler”, and now belongs to the Grand Duke; and yet Zoltso is not included in the overall summary of the Zhaben volost, as if it were intended to be an independent administrative center of the newly emerging (so far only in potentia) volost. It is also very important that the numbers “according to the old letter” are not mentioned at all in the inventory of Zoltz: apparently, like the villages of Svyatoy and Bereza, Zoltso did not yet exist at the time of the previous census. And by 1495, the Zoltso churchyard was still a very insignificant village and therefore young. aa) The villages assigned to it are not yet listed at all. bb) With its 8 courtyards and 9 fields 5 Zoltso goes out, however, more significant than the villages of Svyatoe and Bereza, but is far inferior to the current village of Shchuchya 6 (pp. 622–623: “and at the Povitkinsky end” of the Zhabenskaya volost “the village of Shchuchye near the lake near Shchuchya” with 14 courtyards; “they sow rye 38 boxes, and hay is mowed half-300 kopecks, 16 obezh”) and does not stand up to any comparison with the churchyards of Zaluchye (52 yards, 61 houses) and Berezovets (32 houses). Consequently, without much error it can be accepted that the Zolzo churchyard and the church on Kravotyn have existed only since the half of the 15th century. It is not superfluous to eliminate one misunderstanding made by Rev. V.P. Uspensky: he thinks (p. 4) that the village of Zhar in the Kravotyn parish lay “at the Zharovsky end of the Zhabny volost.” I draw your attention to the trail. corner of the Novgorod province: A river flows between Black Mud and the village of Nativity of the Virgin, which then flows from the southwest into the river. Shlipu. This river, not named by name, has a length of about 40 Versts and flows from Lake Granishna (it lies at 57°28'N, 33°28'E from Greenwich), oblong and northeastern of three neighboring lakes (Seremo, Tikhmen, Granitno). - Compare with this the data of the “Census Book”, page 615: “And at the Zharovsky end of the village of Sachki (now Gachki?] – 6 obezh” “the village of Poddubye – 9 obezh” Gryazovitsa [now Black Mud?] – 4 obzhy” – “the village of Popirachevo on the river on Granichna – 12 obezh, the village of Zhary – 14 obezh, village of Zhary - 2 obzhy " - - “And in the Granitsky end" "the village of Gachnikovo [now Gachki?], the village of Glebezdovo on the river on Granichna." From this, in any case, it is clear that both the Zharovsky end and the adjacent Granitsky end lay near Domkin and the Nativity of the Virgin, not near Zhar, Lyapina and Sand against the Nile Desert. was the extreme limit of Novgorod settlements; there were no villages to the south and southwest of Zolets. And to the south of present-day Pachkovo, approximately at φ = +57°12', the Novgorod Derevskaya Pyatina ended and the Rzheva Volodimerova volost began 7 . The “Census Obrochnaya Book” did not preserve the names of the members of the clergy of the introduced church, and this is not surprising: the three courtyards on church land 8 were of little interest from a tax point of view; The members of the clergy are not “heavy people.” Now - a spelling question. It is known that in the Tver province there is the village of Krovotyn, and in the Tver diocese there is the village of Kravotyn. Which of the two spellings is correct: provincial or diocesan? The fact that in the “Census Book” it is written: “on Krovotyn”; but this does not solve the issue. It is also possible, of course, that the local residents, pronouncing “Kravotn”, replaced the ancient unstressed o with their high Pskov a; but it is equally possible that the surrounding Novgorodians distorted the unstressed a of the local dialect. Comp. (p. 640) oscillation between “monastery” and “monastic”; compare “Ovdeyko” = Ἀβδάς, (and on p. 629), “Onkudinko = Ἀκίνδυνος, “Onfimko” = Ἄνθιμος. – The same should be said about “Zoltso” instead of the local “Zaltso”. I had occasion to hear that the Most Reverend himself. Gregory, the former Archbishop of Tverskaya and Kashinsky, offered an explanation for the name “Kravotyn” in the sense of “krava” cow and “tyn”: on the site of the village of Kravotyn there supposedly once stood a barnyard. Probably this story is about the Reverend. Grigorin is a myth. And the proposed etymology, in any case, is not a successful one: due to the nature of Russian phonetics, in the 15th century. on the banks of the Seliger only cows were possible, not kravas. Moreover, the word “on Krovotynka” - by analogy with the expressions “on Glubokoe”, “on Shcheberekhe” - is more naturally understood as the name of the river (present-day Kravotynka) or the area itself (like, for example, the name “Zhalino”) in which the church was built. In both cases, this name, as a geographical name, will be older than the village of Kravotyn. And in an area that was once undoubtedly inhabited by foreigners 9, etymological operations on Russian roots are unlikely to help establish the meaning of geographical names 10. In my opinion, the word “Kravotyn” can only be explained by someone who understands the meaning of such names as “Fu-tyn” (or “Khu-tyn”), “Skovoro-tynya” (pogost of Rzhev district). And since we do not understand the meaning of the name “Kravotyn”, there is a spelling dilemma: “Kravotyn” or “Krovotyn”? remains unsolvable. Clergy of the Vvedensky Church in the village of Kravotyni The list of priests and church ministers of Kravotyn can only begin in 1781, since copies of metric books stored in the church archive begin in 1781. 11 Here is the full title of the two oldest metrics: From the testimony of the metric of 1782, we can draw the conclusion that these books only appeared in 1781 by order of the Reverend. Arseny III Vereshchagin; and until then they lived in simplicity, without documentary reporting. From these copies the following list can be extracted: Already a priest in 1781. His last service was performed on April 12, 1805 (I, 18.19) 13. And on “January 20,” 1807 (III, 7), “the village of Kravotyni, the deceased priest Moses Karpov’s wife, widow Anna Leontyeva, 70 years old,” was buried; and assault in 1805 and 1806. The name of the priest Moisei Karpov no longer exists. Apparently he died and was not buried in Kravotyn. It seems about. Moses was a very good owner: he knew how to not only settle the matter of building his house on peasant land, but also document it 14 3); for the mow, which was in his possession, and is still called “Myseevskoe”. But he, apparently, did not enjoy special honor among his closest superiors: in 1781–1784. in metrics the name of Moses Karpov comes first; in 1785 the first to write was Efim Vasilyev, and from 1786 the primacy passed to Maxim Emelyanov. Already a priest in 1781 16 Widows since 1785 17 Died, apparently, in 1787 18 Kravotyn priest probably from the end of 1784 19; has been leading since 1786; in 1792 (the only time) he was named blogochinny; On October 3, 1804 (I, 88) he made his last demand; and on October 16 [Sunday] 1804 (III, 53) it is written: “The village of Kravotyni, priest Maxim Emelianov (65 years old), by the will of God, died with repentance and was buried at the church; buried by priests Moses and Parthenos with a deacon and clergy." Of course, the son of priest Evfimy Vasiliev (A, 2). 1781 finds “Parfeniy Efimov” as a sexton in Kravotyn. He is married to Stepanida Afanasyeva (1789 (I) January 5; 1792 (I) September 23). In 1787 he had a hand in becoming a third priest. From May 1805 to September 1813, he remained the only priest in Kravotyn; On January 28, 1814 (II.18) he performed his last prayer; and “March 13” 1814 (III, 14) “Kravotyny priest Parfeniy Efimov, 53 years old, was buried by priest Ivan Ivanov.” He fulfilled the first requirement on October 30, 1813 (I, 79) and in the book issued to “priest Parthenius Efimov from the clerics” for 1813 he signed as follows: “Priest John Ioannov contributed his hand in three months” 20 . Married to Euphemia Vlaseva (May 1, 1817, I, 43). 6. Ioann Grigoriev [Sokolov] Kravotyn priest from the end of 1815 21. Married to Anna Nikolaeva (April 15, 1817, I, 40). The last requirement was fulfilled on April 14, 1818 (Transferred to the village of Sukhoshiny) 22. 7. Ioann Vasiliev Vishnyakov From the end of 1816 23. The first demand was made on January 10, 1817 (I). Married to Anna Stefanova 24 Smirnova, daughter of a priest in the village of Bernova, Staritsa Ubad (October 3, 1817, I, 143; March 30, 1825, I, 39). The last requirement was made on May 10, 1825 (III, 16 g). The first demand was made on December 26, 1819 (I), the last on January 8, 1821 (I). Married to Alexandra Matveeva, daughter of a priest in the village of Yakonov, Vyshnevolotsk district (November 13, 1820 I, 165). 9 . Arseny Filippov Sokolov Son of Deacon Philip Onisimov (B, 5), married to Elisaveta Petrova 25. The first requirement was made on December 17, 1827. (I, 174) 26. 10. Alexander Petrov Orlov The son of the priest of the Ostashkov Resurrection Church, Peter Ivanov (June 16, 1881, I), married to Anna Feodotova Izotova from the village of Golenkova, Ostashkovsky district. He was a deacon in the Kravotyn Church (the first service was July 25, 1828 [II, 39], the last was February 15, 1831 [II]). The first priestly service April 26, 1831 [I] 27. Of course, the brother of the priest Moisei Karpov (A, 1; cf. B, 2), was retired before 1781; apparently still alive in 1793 28 Already a deacon in 1781; the last assault in which his name is mentioned is in the metrics of 1808. Married to Fedosya Fedorova? 29 February 12, 1783 (II, 38) of the village of Kravotyni priests son... These likely numbers are based on the trail. data: a) On the “Special Map of European Russia”, published in 1890 by the Military Topographical Department of the General Staff on a scale of 1:420000, i.e. 1 inch 10 versts, on sheet 42 the village of Kravotyn stands aa) somewhat [about ½ millimeter] further north than Yeltsy, bb) 10 millimeters east of the Nilova Pustyn, andˆvv) 16 millimeters east of the Sosnitsa churchyard, soˆgg) the difference in longitude between the Nilova Pustyn and Sosnitsy is 6 millimeters. ß) In Exposé des Travaux Astronomiques et Géodésiques exécutés en Russie dans un but géographique jusqu’à I’année 1855, par T.F. de Schubert, St. Pétersbourg 1858, p.46, it is accepted that the astronomical observatory at Moscow University lies at 55 0 14’4’’, 499 east longitude from Ferro; whereas in The Nautical Almanac for the year 1898, p. 586, it is accepted that this observatory lies at 2h 30m 17s.08 E [2 hours. 30 min. 17.03 sec. east] of Greenwich, i.e. + 37 0 34’16’’, 30 east from Greenwich. Therefore, to convert Ferro longitudes in the work of General Schubert into Greenwich ones, within the provinces of Moscow, Tver and Novgorod, you can use the formula: F – 17 0 39’48’’, 299 = G y) In the same work of Schubert we find a trace. data: No. 11725. Pustyn Nikolaia Stalobenk. Clocher de L'église cathédrale Hermitages of Nile Stolobensky, cathedral bell tower, 57 0 14’7’’, 13 N.50°43′42′′, 1.48 E. duty. 11756. S. Jeley, clocher de l'église 57°16′44′′, 58 north. lat. 50°34′36′′, 90 . eastern duty. 11895. S. Sosnicy, clocher de l'église Sosnitsy village, bell tower, 57°23′58′′, 65 north. latitude, 50°41'2", 94 east. duty. So, the difference in longitude of Sosnitsy and the Nile Desert = 0°2′39′′, 54 which is equal (according to a rr)] 6 millimètres, therefore 0°0′26′′, 59 = 1 millimètre. And therefore 50°41′2′′, 94 50°43′42′′, 48 + 0°7'5", 44 = 16 mm. + 0°4'25", 20 = 10 mm =50°48′8′′, 38 = longitude s. Kravotyni = 50°48′8′′, 38 The exact geographical coordinates of the village of Kravotyni are unknown; firstly because the geodetic triangulation carried out in 1840–1847. in the Tver province by generals Schubert and Tuchkov, affecting quite a few churchyards in the Ostashkovsky district (for example, under No. 11713 Pog. Steri [pog. Sterzh], clocher de l'église, 57°13′38′′, 63 north latitude. 50°14′27′′, 03 east long., next λ + 32°34′38′′, 701 G), passed the village of Kravotyn. And secondly, all the latitudes and longitudes in Schubert’s work are not astronomical, but geodetic, based on a network of triangles connecting the areas of the Tver province with the Great Bell Tower (the latter has astronomical latitude =55°44′52′′, 498 geodetic latitude = +55°45′ 0′′, 90 and east longitude = +55°17′ 4′′, 319 F); therefore, for example, the city of Ostashkov (1°24′37′′, 29 north of Ivan the Great by triangulation) turns out to be under f = + 57°9729", 788, respectively + 57°9′38′′, 1, while Voinov determined the astronomical latitude of Ostashkov in 1846 at + 57°9′42′′, 48 . Exposé, pp. 44.46.41. However, it should be noted that we know very little in geography with accuracy; for example, even the difference in longitude between the most famous observatories in the world, Greenwich and Paris, is still unknown with absolute accuracy: Greenwich Observatory puts this difference at 2°20′13′′.50, Parisian at 2°20′14′′, 40 , and the Berlin one at 2°20′15′′, 45. The symbol λ to denote geographical longitudes (to Germans it resembles the word Länge, longitude) is accepted at least by German and English scientists (French astronomers like to put a curly “L” instead of λ). The sigla f to indicate geographic latitudes is generally accepted among astronomers (in Germany, France, England). It is probably of German origin and originally replaced the Latin “ph”, i.e. “Polhöhe”, height of the pole (above the horizon), elevatio poli. The altitude of the pole is the angle that the earth's (and world's) axis makes with the horizon plane. This angle is always equal to the geographic latitude of the place (for example, at the equator, the earth's axis lies in the horizontal plane, and the height of the pole above the horizon is therefore 0°: and the geographic latitude at the equator = 0°). Northern latitudes are recognized as positive (+ sign), southern ones as negative (- sign), eastern longitudes as positive, western longitudes as negative. --- The so-called prime (first) meridian from Ferro is essentially the Parisian meridian, only increased by exactly 20° degrees. For scientific geography, the choice is only possible between the Greenwich and Paris meridians. The Pulkovo Observatory in 1878–1879 gave preference to the Greenwich meridian and in 1884 at the Washington conference, together with the majority of delegates, voted for the Greenwich meridian. According to The Nautical Almanac, the Pulkovo observatory lies 2h [orae] 1m 18s.63 east of Greenwich; therefore, longitude from Pulkovo + 30°19′39′′, 45 – longitude from Greenwich. This is obviously the current churchyard of Berezovets (with the church holiday of the “cherished resurrection”). In Exposé, General Schubert “11798. Pog. Berezofskii, clocher de l'église o +57°18′28′′, 78 +32°47′20′′, 73 from Greenwich Nowadays the churchyard is Berezovsky Ryadok (with the church feast of the Transfiguration). Therefore, it is impossible to decide which of these two neighboring churchyards is in Exposé under No. 11798. On the “Special Map of European Russia” to the north-west of “P[ogost] Berezovsky”, 4.2 versts in a straight line, there is a [village], Shiberikha” on the northern shore of an unnamed lake, apparently the same one that is already mentioned in the “Scribe Books” (p. 651: “and in Shcheberikha there is a lake”). “The area of ​​1500 was 3–6 dessiatines, but by the end of the 16th century. constantly 5 acres” (P.A. Sokolovsky). But the “Census Book” is usually accepted in 21/2 tithes. – The ancient grain measure kad (otherwise known as okov, barrel) was divided into 2 ladles, a ladle into 2 quarters (otherwise known as boxes), boxes into 2 octopuses (otherwise known as goiters), a goiter into 2 tubs, a tub into 2 small tubs (or quarters = 1/4 of a goiter). The tithe was divided into 2 quarters (because there were 2 quarters for sowing per tithe). Exposé: 11880 S[elo Szezuczie el. de l'église en pierre (bell tower of the stone church) φ = + 57°22′2”, 83 λ= + 33°24′54′′, 78 from Greenwich. compare part of the map of the ancient Rzhensky district with the article by Prot. B.P. Uspensky: “Lithuanian border towns: Seluk, Goryshin and others,” Tver 1892. Northern part of the present Ostashkov district. (where Sterzh, Uvitsy, Yeltsy, Kravotyn lie) is called the “Novgorod inscription”. It is absolutely incredible that in the Zoltsev churchyard in 1495 there were more clergy than in the Berezovets churchyard. The name “Volga” cannot be separated from the Estonian walgus (Finnish valkeus) light, est. walge (Finnish: valkea white). And “Seliger probably comes from est. selge, sälgä (Finnish selvă) light, clear, clean, and est. järw (Finnish järvI) lake: = light lake. The following example may serve as a warning against such etymological experiments. On the western shore of the Black Sea lies the city of Μεσημβρία. From any Greek lexicon you can learn that μεσημβρία means noon and then south. But the city of Mesimvria has nothing in common with either midday or the south: Strabon (Geographica, 7, 6:1) preserved for us the positive news that in the pseudo-Greek Μεσημβρία hides a distorted Thracian name Μενεβρία [more precisely, it should have been said Μενεβρέ] and that “βρία [more accurately βρέ] in Thracian means πόλις, city”; so that it is non-Greek in origin, and the Thracian city Μενεβρία [Μενεβρέ] means Μένα πόλις, the city of Mena, the city built by Men. The only thing missing is copies for five years (from 1794 to 1798). The copy of the register of those who died in 1809 ends on February 15: obviously it was not completed. The assaults are sometimes omitted (for example, the years 1782, 1791, 1807, etc.), sometimes they are shortened (in 1786, only priest Maxim Emelyanov applied his hand; in 1785, sextons and sextons were omitted; etc.). Only since the 19th century. The custom is established, when performing requirements, to accurately note which of the clergy was at their correction. Only in April 1831 did they begin to use surnames in these records (“baptized by priest Arseny Filippov Sokolov”); but in this year’s assault the surnames are still omitted (“priest Arseny Filippov”); since 1832, surnames have also been introduced into assault; but only books for 1836 were first issued to priests Arseniy Filippov Sokolov,” etc. In 1737 or 1738 his wife was born. Roman numerals indicate parts of metric books (I - born, II - married, III - deceased), Arabic - the serial number of the entry. The famous case of sexton Vasily Antipov Tikhomirov. Wed. A, 4. I accept the 20 year difference in age between father and son. In 1781–1784 written second; in 1785 first, in 1786 and 1767 in third place is: “and Efim Leontiev.” This is “I will answer Leontiev about the scribe’s negligence, as well as “Moisey Vasiliev” (instead of “Nikifor Moiseev”) in the assault of 1784; as well as “Maxim [instead of “Vasily Maximov”] in the assault of 1792. On January 12, 1785, “the village of Kravotyn, priest Evfimy, wife of Theodosius” was buried. In 1787, the books were issued to “priests Maxim Emelyanov, Moisey Karpov and Efim Leontiev”, and were given hands by priests Maxim Emelyanov, Moisey Kariov and Parfeniy Efimov. In 1784, his name is not yet in the assault; but the books for 1795 were issued to “priests.” The successors of Fr. Pankov were: a) priest. Alexander Ivanovich Nevsky (married to Elena Ivanov Pavkova); b) priest Pavel Alesandrovich Nevsky. His name is not in the assault of 1815; but the book for 1816 was issued to “priests Ivan Ivanov and Ivan Grigoriev.” On June 9, 1818 (I, 61), “the priest of the village of Sukhoshik, priest Ivan Grigoriev,” was the successor. The book for 1817 was issued to “priests Ivan Vasiliev, Ivan Grigoriev and Ivan Ivanov” Buried March 24, 1867 Her deaf-mute brother, Yegor Petrov Orlov, a gilder, lived in Kravotyn with Fr. Arseny and gilded the iconostasis in the Ilyinsky border. In this iconostasis there are icons of St. Arseny of Tver, St. Elizabeth and St. George Khozevit. It is clear that St. Ivan Grigoriev was the successor to Parfeniy Evimiev, Vasily Mokiev was the successor to Ivan Grigoriev. But after 1891, the place of the third priest was, if I am not mistaken (a trace of this, apparently, is in the clergy), was assigned to someone who was still studying at the seminary. Priest A.P. Orlov successor I.V. Vishnyakova. Successor A.P. Orlova was A.I. Penkin, married to M.A. Orlova. – Successor to priest A.F. Sokolov was Dimitry Maksimovich Speransky; but the place of the third priest was recognized as supernumerary, and Fr. Demetrius was transferred to the village of Svyatoye in a newly opened parish, - A, 5. 7. 9. 10 can be filled in with completely accurate dates from the clergy registers. February 30 [read. 3rd] 1793, the elderly deacon Ivan Karpov’s wife Anna Andreeva, 65 years old, was buried in the village of Kravotyni. January 4, 1819 (III, 3g) buried “Kravotyni deaconess widow Fedosya Fedorov, 80 years old.” You might be interested in: