1809 г.

January 26. On the assignment of Hierodeacon Philaret to teach higher rhetoric at the Alexander Nevsky Academy, and the outline he compiled for teaching this science A member of the commission of theological schools, Metropolitan Ambrose of Novgorod, in a proposal dated January 26, 1809, No. 7, declaring to the commission that some of the seminary teachers summoned for the newly founded academy had come to him, and among them, the teacher of the Trinity Seminary, Hierodeacon Philaret, with the certificates issued to them, added that he, both to them and to some of local teachers, entrusted the compilation of notes for teaching science, according to their knowledge and inclinations, and that he entrusted Hierodeacon Philaret, moreover, with teaching higher rhetoric at the academy, instead of the teacher of this class, the cathedral hieromonk Misail, who was dismissed from this position due to illness. The commission, after hearing this, having given justice to the order made by Metropolitan Ambrose regarding the assignment to the arriving teachers to draw up notes, and recognizing the need to see them in order to draw up a reliable conclusion about the knowledge and abilities of those teachers, in a journal dated the same January 26, decided (Art. 14): forward a copy of this resolution to Metropolitan Ambrose, so that he will submit to the commission the notes he requested when they are delivered to him by the teachers. In February of the same year, Hierodeacon Philaret, in pursuance of Art. 14. journal of the commission of theological schools, announced to him through Metropolitan Ambrose, presented to the metropolitan, who handed over to the commission, the following summary, in Latin, compiled by Hierodeacon Philaret: Methodi, qua juventus ecclesiastica, meo quidem, si quod est, judicio, ad solidam humaniorum litterarum scientiam duci possit, conspectus brevis Quod si eloquentiae tironum res ageretur ad Burgium eos aut Lejayum remutterem. Sin adultius limandi judicium, et vanae loquentiae pertaesos ad masculam eloquentiam informandi necessitas incumbat: longius proferendi sunt artis limites, et fundamenta altius jacienda. Qua in re licet multi utilem collocavere operam: cum tamen eorum libri pro suo cujusque scopo vel non satis pleni, vel justo sunt longiores, vel denique, quod caput rei est, aut nihil, aut certe parum sacram respiciunt eloquentiam; nullus exstare videtur liber, qui litterarum studiosae juventuti ecclesiasticae ut classicus commendari totus possit. Hinc elegantiores profitenti litteras eclecticam quandam in tradendo methodum observandam esse judicaverim: quae quid sibi velit, ut planius faciam humaniorum studiorum notentur: Caeterum haec non ita scripsi, ut legem in eruditorum republica novam ferre posse mihi viderer; Sed ut, an leges eorum aliqua ex parte non ne fugiant, easque amplectar penitus, ostenderem. Memet forte ipsum quaedam, praesertim in fontibus commonstrandis, correcturum non desperaverim: si, per eorum, quibus mei cura et regimen divinitus commissum est, benevolentiam, tantae rei daretur provincia, modusque aliquis ac tempus suppeteret. Hierodiaconus Philaretus 15 Translation of the abstract. A brief overview of the ways in which, in my extreme understanding, spiritual youth can be brought to a thorough knowledge of the science of fine arts If we were talking about people inexperienced in eloquence, then I would send them to Burgius or Leiai. And if there is a need to improve the mind more developed and in people who do not like empty ranting, to develop a taste for serious eloquence; then we have to expand the boundaries of art (eloquence) and deeper introduce its foundations. Although many have left useful works in this area; but since their books, depending on the purpose that each of them pursued, are either insufficiently complete, or too lengthy, or finally, and most importantly, do not pay any attention, or at least little, to the eloquence of the Church; then it turns out that there is not a single book that could be recommended in its entirety to spiritual youth as exemplary. Therefore, in my opinion, it is necessary for the teacher of fine sciences to resort in some way to the eclectic method. To get a clearer idea of ​​what its requirements are, let us outline for the study of the fine sciences: However, I wrote this not to present myself as a person who can propose new laws for a corporation of scientists, but to show whether I know their laws at all and whether I understand them clearly. I fully hope that, perhaps, I will be able to correct some things myself, especially in indicating the sources, if those who have been entrusted from above with the care and management of me would deign to entrust me with such an important matter and would be given me some means and time to do so. June 12. On the determination of Hierodeacon Philaret as a Bachelor of Philosophy and an inspector of the St. Petersburg Seminary, and a note submitted by him to the seminary board, with a list, about the behavior of students The commission of theological schools, after listening to the proposal of Metropolitan Ambrose with his considerations on the new structure of the Alexander Nevsky Seminary and the district school, in a magazine dated February 23, 1809, by the way, decided (Article 15): clause 3: the class of philosophical sciences in the newly founded seminary should be entrusted to the teacher of rhetoric at the Trinity Seminary, Hierodeacon Philaret, appointing him together as inspector of the seminary; clause 10: the title of professor is granted only to the rector of the seminary, and Hierodeacon Philaret is given the title of bachelor, while others are called teachers at discretion; clause 12: the seminary board consists of the rector, inspector and economist; clause 17: full salaries should be paid only to the rector of the seminary and the bachelor of philosophical sciences and the inspector, Hierodeacon Philaret; For other teachers, the salary can be assigned at the discretion of the Metropolitan of Novgorod, so, however, that it does not exceed the standard amount allocated for teachers' salaries 17. In the journal of the meeting of the seminary board 18, which took place on June 12, 1809, Saturday, under Art. 12., recorded: listened to a note from the inspector, Hieromonk 19 Philaret, with the following content: By virtue of the 73rd paragraph of the statute of the Theological Seminaries, I compiled a list of the behavior of students of the St. Petersburg Seminary, according to the comments I made, both last month, upon receipt of this statute, and even before this time. The first five people placed on this list, on the basis of paragraph 62 of the same charter, for the first time, can constitute the class of elders, perform their duties, and enjoy the rights assigned to this title. Those following them can be, depending on need, assistants to them and in the position of seniors. Moreover, I present the list with the meaning of approval and reprehensible actions 20. It is determined: students Ivan Smirnov, Sergei Delyaev, Ivan Dukhovsky, Vasily Razumovsky and Andrei Vasilyev are to be appointed as senior students and given the rights specified in paragraph 63 of the seminary charter. Give them instructions for their positions and lists of students entrusted to their supervision. Announce this to them at the board, and to notify everyone, read this journal article at a meeting of all students 21. September 3. On the assignment to the inspector of the St. Petersburg seminary, Hieromonk Philaret, the position of rector of the Alexander Nevsky district school: submission to his seminary board about issuing books to him for incoming and outgoing papers for the school A member of the commission of theological schools, Metropolitan Ambrose of Novgorod, with a proposal dated July 21, 1809, submitted it for consideration, either for the appointment of the bachelor, Hieromonk Philaret, as the rector of the Alexander Nevsky district school, or for the position thereof, entrusting him with the operation of parish schools not only in the local, but also in other districts of St. Petersburg diocese, before the opening of the district schools, and with the payment of his rector's salary, since he, on the recommendation of the board of the St. Petersburg seminary, on the basis of the statutes of the seminary and district schools, entrusted this position to this bachelor pending consideration. To this, the Metropolitan added that the board is now asking permission to pay this hieromonk the salary according to the staff of the rector of the district school. The commission, after hearing this proposal, in a journal on July 31, 1809, among other things, decided (Art. 1): in accordance with the opinion of Metropolitan Ambrose, the position of rector in the district school at the Alexander Nevsky Lavra should be entrusted, pending discretion, to Hieromonk Philaret, entrusting him with the responsibility for those parish schools that are assigned to the said district school; the salary assigned to the rector on staff is 450 rubles. per year, to begin production for him, Filaret, from the date of this resolution 22. The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on September 3, 1809, records what was heard: a presentation from the ruling rector of the school located at this seminary, Hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: By virtue of the 13th, 19th and 21st paragraphs of the second part of the charter of district schools, I must have from the Seminary Board these books for recording incoming and outgoing papers, on the internal and external parts of the school board, and submit them to the board for the issuance of four books to me. It is determined: the required books, with proper sealing, will be issued to Hieromonk Philaret, who is holding the post of rector at the St. Petersburg district school, 23. September 11th. A note from the inspector of the St. Petersburg Theological Seminary, Hieromonk Philaret, presented to the seminary board, about the bad behavior of some students The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on September 11, 1809, records what was heard: a note from the inspector’s father, Hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: On the 10th day of September, students of the Seminary: Konstantin Chernyavsky, Alexey Golminsky, Vasily Suvorov, Nikolai Meshchersky, having left the Seminary for a singing position, went to the singing without permission, and in the evening they came to the Seminary drunk; and the last of them, coming into the room, kicked out the elder and his assistant, even hit them; that, according to the importance of these offenses, is submitted to the discretion of the Board. Nikolai Meshchersky, in his own testimony, admitted that he went away during school hours to visit without permission, drank beer and punch; on the way back he got into a fight, first with an unknown person passing by, and then with a bottle shop; from the testimony of priors Vasiliev and Bystryakov, it is clear that he, Meshchersky, came into the room drunk, tried to beat the elders and even hit, but could not beat anymore, broke the bed, the government levy and scattered the priors’ clothes. According to the certificate, it turned out that he, Meshchersky, had previously been drunk; lazy and unsuccessful in learning. And this year, 1809, the 3rd day of June, he himself submitted a petition for his dismissal from the seminary for assignment to a clerkship. Chernyavsky, Golminsky and Suvorov admitted that they went to the tonya without permission, and then to the tavern, and on the way back they helped Meshchersky in a fight. From the prior’s testimony it is clear that they came home at 8 o’clock and went to bed before dinner, from which it can be concluded that they were intoxicated. According to the certificate, it turned out that all three of them did not achieve much in their studies, and often skipped classes without a good reason. Chernyavsky had not previously been noticed for bad behavior, and Golminsky and Suvorov had previously been fined for bad actions. It has been determined: since Meshchersky creates temptation with his vicious actions and has become intolerant in cohabitation with his violence, he is completely hopeless in learning and does not want to study in the future. In order to exclude him from the seminary, without a certificate, and as a choirboy, with this especially written down, present him to his Eminence for the discretion, and inform the academic board of the board by presentation. Chernyavsky for leaving the seminary without permission, going into a tavern, joining a fight and being drunk, reprimand the board and keep him on bread and water for three days. Golminsky and Suvorov, who were guilty of the same thing and had previously been fined for drunkenness, to further motivate them to reform, should be kept under arrest for five days, and then given a severe reprimand by the board. And this definition, for everyone to hear, read at meal 24. September 18. Representation of the ruling rector of the St. Petersburg seminary, district school, Hieromonk Philaret, on the admission of a student of the former Alexandronevsky Academy Pavel Petrovsky to the number of students of the district school The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on September 18, 1809, records what was heard: a presentation from the ruling rector of the district school located at the same, bachelor, Hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: The former Alexandronevskaya Academy, first class, student Pavel Petrovsky, who had previously been staying with his father due to a long-term illness, now, after recovery, with a ticket given to him from the former Academy, appeared at the local district school. But since during the formation of this school, due to his absence, he was not included in the school list: I am submitting his inclusion in it for the permission of the Seminary Board. Determined: to be included in the list, and notified to the spiritual consistory. 25 September 28. Note from the inspector of the St. Petersburg Theological Seminary, Hieromonk Philaret, about the inaccurate performance of the duties of the seminary ministers The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on September 28, 1809, records what was heard: a note from Fr. inspector, Hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: The room servants of the seminary and district school, as can be seen from the reports of the elders, and I noticed when visiting the rooms, do not always report to their posts regularly; A similar oversight has been repeatedly noticed among the gatekeepers. Why wouldn’t it be appropriate for the Seminary Board, for better order, to make a permanent order regarding which minister should be responsible for what? I submit this opinion to the discretion of the Board. It was determined: in order to more conveniently see who caused the malfunctions in the cells, then, in accordance with the opinion of the inspector, Hieromonk Philaret, create a schedule of which of the servants should do what work and present it; for execution, give a copy of this magazine article about. economist. 26 October 7. Representation of the ruling rector of the St. Petersburg district school, Hieromonk Philaret, that the five land maps and a chronology table sent to the school, in order to better preserve them, he considers it necessary to paste on canvas The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on October 7, 1809, records what was heard: a presentation from the ruling rector of the local district school, Hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: Five land maps and a chronology table sent to the district school, for better preservation, I decided it was necessary to paste on canvas. But since the economic part is the responsibility of the Seminar Board, then I submit for the permission of the Board to correct the indicated need. It was determined: to correct it and, at what cost, pay the money from the district school’s unpaid sum, and enter it into the expense book, with a receipt. To fulfill this, send a copy of this article to Fr. economy 27. October 22. Representation of the ruling rector of the St. Petersburg district school, Hieromonk Philaret, on the unauthorized leaving of the school by two students of the upper division of the first class The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on October 22, 1809, records what was heard: a presentation from the ruling rector of the district school, bachelor, Hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: Pupils of the 1st grade of the higher department, Ivan Meshchersky and the lower, Yakov Yastrebovsky, left the school without permission. The first of them returned from vacation late and without showing (as can be seen from the monthly teacher’s report) any disposition to study, at the end of the month he completely left the classes and the school house, and the second did not show up to classes for the entire past month. But in paragraph 60 of the first part of the charter of district theological schools it is said: the rector immediately reports to the Seminary Board about those leaving the school without permission and before completing the course and awaits permission. And according to the certificate of the previous behavior of these students, it turned out that Ivan Meshchersky had good abilities, but was lazy, noticed in frequent unauthorized absences from classes and school; Yakov Yastrebovsky has average abilities, is lazy, playful and has previously skipped classes. Defined: to be added to the list of lazy and incapable of learning, for presentation, where it should be 28. October 30. Presentation by the reigning rector of the St. Petersburg district school, Hieromonk Philaret, about books distributed to students for money and free of charge, as well as about books for which money has not yet been received The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on October 30, 1809, records that they listened to a presentation from the ruling rector of the local district school, Hieromonk Philaret, at which they were presented: 1. Display of books for which money was collected, since the money itself is 30 rubles. 15 k., to deliver them to the spiritual consistory. For the same 2, a list of poor students, showing the rank of their parents and the books given to them free of charge; and finally 3, a list of the children of the clergy, with an indication of the books they also took, for which the following money (mostly based on the remoteness of the parents’ residence) has not yet been presented. Determined: to forward money and copies of lists 29 to the spiritual consistory upon notification 30. November 15. Presentation of the ruling rector of the Aleksandronevsky district school, Hieromonk Philaret, with an opinion on the distribution and use of books sent for the school In the journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on November 15, 1809, it is recorded that they heard: a presentation from the ruling position of the rector of the Aleksandronevsky district school, bachelor, hieromonk Philaret, with the following content: By order of this Board, dated October 27, under No. 403, 112 copies of 31 Grammar and Abbreviated Language were sent to the district school of Latin Amvrosieva, and 60 copies of Eutropius 32. In discussing the distribution and use of these books, I considered it necessary to submit the following for the permission of the Seminary Board: 1. Although partes singing is prescribed for the upper class of the district school, but since some of them are also imperfect in simple singing, won’t everyone be allowed to use part of the practice? 2. since almost all the students have Mr. Lebedev’s Latin Grammar, then taking into account the habit made by many students towards it, since their very interest is especially at a time when they are obliged to buy other books, would it not be good to distribute the new Grammar for the first time only to the students of the first department, and to those who do not have the old one, and to postpone its general use, and for how long? 3. Since Cornelius has already been accepted for general translation in the higher class, would it not be considered to appoint Eutropius for similar use in the second section of the lower class, however, providing the students of the higher class with a private reading of this author. It is determined: 1, it goes without saying that one must reach for the highest art in singing gradually, starting from the initial rules and in the easiest ways; for this purpose, in the higher department of the district school it is allowed to use everyday life; 2, in accordance with the opinion of the ruling rector, Hieromonk Philaret, in respect of the reasons presented by him, it is allowed, according to Lebedev’s grammar, to continue teaching the Latin language to those who are accustomed to it; why give out the new grammar, composed by the Right Reverend Ambrose, only to those who are beginning to study, with the intention that in the future, students who have entered the district school will be guided by this same latter; 3, the reading of Cornelius Nepos in the higher department of the district school continues, and the use of Eutropius for home exercise is allowed; Likewise, in the lower department, the teacher and students are not forbidden to dissect Eutropius. With this prescribed, send an order to the ruling post of rector, Hieromonk Philaret; and if there is no basis for this permission in the charter, then submit this to the academic board for consideration 33 . November 15. The opinion of Hieromonk Philaret regarding the filling of the positions he is holding, regarding his appointment to the St. Petersburg Theological Academy in the departments of theological sciences and church history In pursuance of the order of the commission of theological schools to instruct the board of the St. Petersburg seminary to elect candidates for positions sent by Hieromonk Philaret, the academic board, in its submission to the commission, dated November 15, 1809, No. 22, explained that, in the opinion of the rector of the seminary, Archimandrite Anatoly, and the economist, priest P. Uspensky, candidates for positions sent Hieromonk Philaret in the seminary there are no others except teachers: Greek and French languages D. Voronov and lower rhetoric Y. Tolmachev; but they also verbally announced to the board that they did not agree to accept the inspector position. At the same time, Mr. Tolmachev, in addition to mathematics, which, if he changed, there would be no one to teach at the seminary, and at the academy he holds a rather significant position at the conference; and Mr. Voronov is supposed to be entrusted with the highest class of rhetoric when the priest Malinovsky receives his dismissal. The inspector and bachelor of theological sciences, Hieromonk Philaret, presented his special opinion as follows, as indicated in the submission from the board of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy for the 3rd department, dated November 15, 1809, No. 25: It will be to the honor of the seminary and to the approval of higher and lower teachers that they can be gradually promoted to higher positions, at the discretion of the higher authorities. Why I believe: teachers Mr. Voronov and Mr. Tolmachev, out of respect for their activities in their current positions and previous service, should be presented as candidates for the philosophical class required by the Commission of Theological Schools, without separating from the latter and the mathematics class. As for the positions of inspector and rector of a district school, I do not consider them to be inextricably linked with the philosophical class, but since they are associated with special care, as well as responsibility, I recognize that it is most convenient to appoint them to them by determination, according to ability and consideration of other positions, rather than asserting oneself on desire, whose preliminary announcement may be hindered by modesty, and some distrust of oneself, and the uncertainty of the future. On the daily note on the affairs of the seminary board, dated October 30, against the sixth article, Metropolitan Ambrose wrote the following: “I approve of the opinion of Father Philaret; I propose to present it with the sixth article and this.” Therefore, the academic board, with the definition of the seminary board, the opinion of Hieromonk Philaret and the proposal of Metropolitan Ambrose, submitted this to the discretion of the commission of theological schools. The commission, in a journal dated November 20 of the same 1809 (Article 15), decided: “to teach a philosophical class in the newly established local seminary, in place of Hieromonk Philaret, intended as a bachelor at the local academy, to elect the Kyiv Academy prefect, philosophy and the highest class of pure mathematics teacher, the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra cathedral hieromonk Methodius. As a result, the commission submitted a proposal to the Holy Synod on an order to the Metropolitan of Kyiv, so that he would immediately send the aforementioned Hieromonk Methodius here to Metropolitan Ambrose, and notify the latter, with a copy of this resolution forwarded to him, that Hieromonk Philaret, before the proper introduction of the aforementioned Prefect Methodius into the seminary, must correct positions held by him, both in the seminary and in the district school, and that accordingly she will expect from him, the metropolitan, notification of the arrival here of Hieromonk Methodius, for the appropriate order on her part, about entrusting both Methodius and Philaret with the positions assigned to them 34. December 11. A note from the inspector of the St. Petersburg Seminary, Hieromonk Philaret, about the student Nikolai Ilyinsky, who left the seminary without permission and was brought, drunk, from the guardhouse, behind the guard, with a note The journal of the meeting of the seminary board, which took place on December 18, 1809, records that they listened to a note from Fr. Inspector Hieromonk Philaret, with whom he reported to the board, on that December 11th day, the following: Last night, student Nikolai Ilyinsky left the Seminary without permission at six o’clock in the evening, and in the first hour he was brought drunk from the guardhouse, behind the guard, with a note. And from the testimony taken from him, it is clear that he, Nikolai Ilyinsky, came to the guardhouse and looked for girls and seminarians; that after being frightened, he called himself by a false name and the student on duty, Pyotr Gerbov and Fomin, having investigated this matter, reported to the Board that he, Ilyinsky, had been brought from the guardhouse, behind the guard, with a note, and that it was as if the Right Reverend himself and the Seminary rector had sent him there to look for other seminarians, and therefore he demanded them from the non-commissioned officer; that he cursed the guards, shouted and, searching in the chambers and under the benches, demanded some two girls. According to the certificate, it turned out that the student Nikolai Ilyinsky, Vladimir diocese and district, churchyard of Semnitsa, the son of the deceased priest John Semyonov, studied at the Vladimir Seminary, and on September 28, 1805, at his request and according to the resolution given by His Eminence, he was admitted to the Alexander Nevsky Academy, which is now the Seminary, for training sciences and was on government pay; He studied with mediocre success, and had previously been repeatedly noticed for unauthorized absences and drunkenness, for which on December 4th of this year he was punished with three days of arrest. And the Charter of Theological Seminaries in paragraph 85 says: expulsion from the seminary and sending to a civil department cannot be allowed otherwise than for important faults, and while all other methods of correction were used in vain. It is carried out by determination of the Board with the approval of the Diocesan Bishop. Why did the board determine: the said student Nikolai Ilyinsky, as if he was bringing dishonor to the entire school and in cohabitation causing temptation to his comrades, to be excluded from the number of government employees and from cohabitation with students. And since he cannot support himself on his kosht, and does not belong to the local diocese, then all this should be presented especially to His Eminence for his consideration. At this presentation, the Metropolitan gave the following resolution: “The student of Ilyinsky, expelled from the seminary, should be sent to the Vladimir diocese” 35. Case comm. spirit. taught, stored in the archives of the Holy Synod, 1808, No. 18, l. 13, 25, 39–41. Translated the teacher's notes, in St. Petersburg. spiritual seminar., Latin language M. I. Guryev. Case comm. spirit. taught, stored in the archives of the Holy Synod, 1808, No. 18, l. 168, 170. St. Petersburg Board the spirit of the seminary, in 1809, consisted of the rector, priest. Anatoly, inspector, priest. Philaret and Econom is sacred. Peter Uspensky. On March 28, 1809, on the day of Holy Pascha, Hierodeacon Philaret was ordained by Metropolitan Ambrose as a hieromonk. What he informed his parent, Archpriest of the Kolomna Cathedral Mikhail Feodorovich, about in a letter dated April 15. See “Letters of the Metropolitan. Moscow Philaret to his relatives." M. 1882, p. 118. The list presented by Herod. Filaret, was not found in the journals of the seminary board. Journal semin. right, storage in the archives of St. Petersburg. spirit. seminary, for 1809, l. 13, reverse, art. 12. The matter is comm spirit. taught, stored in the archives of the Holy Synod, 1809, No. 104. Journal. St. Petersburg spirit. Semin., for 1809, l. 19, art. 2; l. 42, art. 1. Journal semin. rules, storing in the archives of St. Petersburg. Semin., for 1809, l. 46, art. 7. Journal St. Petersburg semin. ed., storing in the arch. St. Petersburg Semin., for 1809, pp. 49 rev., 50, art. 10; ll. 53 and 54, art. 2. Journal Semin rules, storing in the archives of St. Petersburg. semin. for 1809, l. 55 rev., art. 1. Journal semin. ed., storing in the archives of St. Petersburg. Semin., for 1809, l. 59, art. 12. Journal semin. right, storage in the archives of St. Petersburg. spirits Semin., for 1809, l. 64, art. 13. Journal semin. right, storage in the archives of St. Petersburg. Semin., for 1809, l. 69, art. 1. There were no lists of these in the board journal. Journal semin. ed., storing in the archives of St. Petersburg. spirit. Semin., for 1809, l. 76 rev. Art. 11.; l. 85. Ambrose (Protasov) from the rector of the St. Petersburg Alexandronevsky Academy, in 1804 Bishop of Tula; 1816 Archbishop of Kazan; 1826 – Tver; died on July 1, 1831. For his literary and scientific works, see Review of Russian. spirit. Literature, Philaret, Archbishop. Chernigovsky, ed. 3, St. Petersburg 1884, pp. 436–438. Russian experience. Bibliographies, V. Sopikova, part 3, no. 3684. Journal semin. right, storage in the archives of St. Petersburg. spirits Semin., for 1809, l. 79, rev. and 80, art. 7. Case comm. spirit. taught, stored in the arch. St. Synod, 1808, No. 46. Journal semin. ed., storing in the archives of the S.-P.burg spirit. Semin., for 1809, l. 102 rev. and l. 103, art. 7; l. 104, art. 3.