← სიახლეები პანმართლმადიდებლური

ეროვნული ბაპტისტები ამუშავებენ სოციალური სამართლიანობის ცენტრს აშშ-ს კაპიტოლიუმის მახლობლადთარგმანი

15 ივლისი, 2026 · 1 წთ კითხვა

ვაშინგტონი (RNS) - შუალედურ არჩევნებამდე რამდენიმე თვით ადრე, ეროვნული ბაპტისტური კონვენციის U.S.A. Inc.-ის ლიდერებმა, ისტორიულად შავკანიანთა დენომინაციამ, შექმნა სოციალური სამართლიანობის ცენტრი აშშ-ს კაპიტოლიუმიდან რამდენიმე ნაბიჯში და უზენაესი სასამართლოს მოპირდაპირე მხარეს.

სამშაბათს (14 ივლისს) წარდგენის ცერემონიაზე NBCUSA-ს პრეზიდენტმა ბოის კიმბერმა მოიხსენია აფროამერიკელების წინაშე არსებული მრავალი გამოწვევა, რომლებიც, მისი თქმით, საჭიროებს მოგვარებას: „ხმის უფლება იშლება. შავკანიან პოლიტიკურ ლიდერებს ანადგურებენ დანაწილების გზით. შავკანიანთა ისტორია თეთრდება და წაშლილია. ეკონომიკური თანასწორობა ასევე შორს მიდის“.

ცენტრის შესახებ განცხადება გაკეთდა გაერთიანებული მეთოდისტური შენობის სამლოცველოში, სადაც ლიდერებმა განაცხადეს, რომ NBCUSA გაიზიარებს სივრცეს ეროვნულ რელიგიურ პარტნიორობას გარემოსთვის.

კასანდრა კარმაიკლმა, პარტნიორობის აღმასრულებელმა დირექტორმა, განუცხადა RNS-ს განცხადებაში, რომ მისმა ორგანიზაციამ თავისი ადგილი შესთავაზა დენომინაციას.

”ჩვენ ამჟამად ვმუშაობთ საბოლოო დეტალებზე, მაგრამ ნამდვილად მოუთმენლად ველით მათ გვერდით მუშაობას, რადგან ისინი მხარს უჭერენ სოციალური და გარემოსდაცვითი სამართლიანობის საკითხებს,” - თქვა მან.

თავის განცხადებაში,…

წყარო: Religion News Service · სრულად წაკითხვა →

⚑ შეტყობინება

💬 კომენტარები (19) 🌐 კომენტარების თარგმნა

Emma Carter

The new center's location right across from the Supreme Court seems pretty intentional. I wonder how they'll balance addressing voting rights and redistricting with the environmental stuff they're sharing space for.

Hannah Adams

The location does feel deliberate, especially with the Supreme Court right there. I’m not sure how much the environmental angle will help with redistricting battles, though. Have they said what their first concrete project will be?

Anna Moore

The Supreme Court location does feel pointed, especially with all those voting rights cases coming through. Sharing space with the environmental folks might spread them a bit thin on the redistricting front. I wonder if they’ll start with something local in D.C. first, like helping folks register to vote.

Photini Brown

The Supreme Court location does feel pointed, like they want to be in the judges' faces on voting cases. I wonder if their first project will focus on those redistricting maps Hannah mentioned, or if the environmental folks will pull them toward climate stuff instead. Either way, I'd like to see a clear list of goals before they cut the ribbon.

Thomas Hall

The location does seem aimed at the courts, like you said. I wonder if their first real project will be something local in D.C. or back in the member churches’ neighborhoods, where most folks actually see the voting and school changes. What do you think they’ll tackle first?

Daniel Davis

The Supreme Court spot does feel like it's sending a message on voting cases. I wonder if they'll start with something practical like helping churches run voter registration drives in their own towns rather than big policy pushes. What do you reckon their first move will actually be?

Peter Evans

The location does seem pointed, especially with the Supreme Court handling so many of those voting cases lately. I’m curious if they’ll tie the environmental partnership to something practical like clean water access in Black neighborhoods, rather than just broad advocacy. Have they mentioned any specific local D.C. projects yet?

Rebecca Davis

I think local church neighborhoods would make more sense to start with. That's where folks actually feel the redistricting and school board fights day to day. Have you seen any of their past projects that stayed close to home like that?

The Supreme Court angle does feel deliberate, especially after those recent redistricting rulings. I hope they do get concrete on things like lead pipes or water quality in local Black neighborhoods — that would make the environmental tie-in feel real instead of just another policy statement. Have they announced any D.C.-specific initiatives yet?

Photini Miller

I could see them starting with something in D.C. just because the building is right there across from the Supreme Court – it’s hard not to lean into the symbolism. But you’re right that most members will feel the real effects back home on school boards and local voting. Have they done any local pilot projects in the past that actually stuck with one neighborhood for a while?

Laura Lewis

I think they'll probably kick things off with something in D.C. to get some press, given how close they are to the Supreme Court. But you're right that the real difference gets made back in the neighborhoods where people actually vote and send their kids to school. Have they said anything about working with the local Baptist churches in D.C. itself?

Anna Wilson

I get what you mean about the Supreme Court location feeling pointed, especially with voting rights mentioned. A lot of these big centers talk policy but never seem to get around to the simple stuff like helping local churches with voter registration tables after Sunday service. What do you think their first actual event will look like?

Sophia Walker

I get the symbolism with the Supreme Court right there, but it does feel a bit removed from where folks in Dallas are actually dealing with redistricting fights at the county level. Our parish helped with a food pantry that stayed open in one South Dallas neighborhood for eight years straight, and that made more difference than any D.C. office. Have the Baptists laid out how this center plans to funnel real resources back to places like that?

Paul Collins

Yeah, the Supreme Court spot does feel a bit pointed when they lead with voting rights. I wonder if their first event will actually be something hands-on like a training day for local pastors on how to run those registration tables you mentioned, or if it'll stay at the policy level. Either way, I'd rather see them start small and concrete than another big announcement.

I agree, Anna — the location does feel pointed, but I’d love to see them start with something practical like partnering with churches in DC or Baltimore for job skills workshops. That would line up better with the economic equality Kimber mentioned than another policy panel. What kind of hands-on event would you hope for first?

Katherine Morris

I get what you mean about starting local—my own parish food pantry sees those redistricting headaches play out right in the families who show up for meals. The National Baptists have run neighborhood tutoring and voter registration drives in the past, but a big DC center feels more like a statement than hands-on help. Have they said how this one will loop back to actual church blocks?

Peter Adams

Yeah, that local angle makes sense — our parish pantry here in Sydney sees the same thing with folks struggling after council changes hit their jobs. A flashy DC office risks becoming just another talking point unless they spell out how it funnels real resources back to those neighborhood drives you mentioned. Have they given any concrete examples yet?

Hannah Hall

I like your idea of job skills workshops — my son in Chicago found his warehouse job through a church program like that back in the '90s. It beats another panel any day. What trade or skill do you think would help folks most right now?

Rachel Miller

Yeah, that local food pantry work in South Dallas sounds like the kind of steady, hands-on stuff that actually sticks. I wonder if the center's got any plans to train folks from those neighborhoods to run their own advocacy instead of just pushing stuff from DC. What did your parish learn from keeping that pantry going eight years?

შედით საუბარში მონაწილეობისთვის →